Carbon dating is accurate

She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.

(They conveniently forget to mention that the tree ring chronology was arranged by C14 dating.

carbon dating is accurate-44carbon dating is accurate-20carbon dating is accurate-74

I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.

If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write.

So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.

If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).

Some believe trees are known to be as old as 9,000 years. A lot of people doubt this claim for various good reasons I wont go into here.

We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.The methodology is quite accurate, but dendrochronology supposedly shows that the C14 dates go off because of changes in the equilibrium over time, and that the older the dates the larger the error.Despite this she continually uses the c14 dates to create 'absolute' chronologies.(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age.

Tags: , ,